Helping You Master Microsoft Technologies

From the Department of “What were they thinking?”

Born To Learn

Born To Learn Blogs

From the Department of “What were they thinking?”

You accidentally dial the wrong number, calling an old boyfriend by mistake. You compose an e-mail complaining about your boss, and somehow send it to your boss.

It’s never pretty when these things happen; and, when we make mistakes like this we usually feel like idiots. Fortunately, there’s always someone just a little worst to make us all feel just a wee bit better about our own mistakes.

Each quarter, Microsoft Learning will feature several case studies based on a compilation of recent issues. Certain facts will be changed for illustrative purposes and to conceal the identities of the parties involved. The actions described below represent Microsoft’s efforts to curb cheating, fraud & piracy to maintain the value of Microsoft Certifications.


Protecting Microsoft’s IP: Disclosing Microsoft intellectual property (IP)

Chris, who worked at a test center in Dublin, Ireland, was engaged to be married soon. The closer the wedding date arrived, the more he realized he needed extra funds to cover his wedding expenses. Thinking of no better way to make a few extra Euros, Chris chose to sell Microsoft Certification exam content on a popular English tech blog. Chris knew better than to use his real name on the blog; he used an alias: IT GENIOUS (of course!). Every day for a week Chris (a.k.a IT GENIOUS) signed-into the blog using his corporate email address and posted Microsoft Certification exam content. When Microsoft discovered these leaks, we investigated. A few clicks and a few IP addresses revealed the source of the posting: Chris@litwareinc.com. Microsoft requested that the authorities bring criminal charges against him.

Microsoft takes the protection and management of our Intellectual Property seriously.  Unauthorized disclosure of confidential information has a profound business impact, and may lead to civil liability or criminal prosecution. Confidential information leaks can devalue Microsoft Certifications, and breach the trust of customers, business partners, governments and communities. Abuses of this nature are not tolerated.

All Microsoft Certification exams, including the content and wording of exam questions, are Microsoft confidential information and protected by intellectual property laws. Microsoft’s Exam Security and Integrity policy states:

Examples of misconduct and/or misuse of the Exam include, but are not limited to, the following: Copying, publishing, disclosing, transmitting, selling, offering to sell, posting, downloading, distributing in any way, or otherwise transferring, modifying, making derivative works of, reverse engineering, decompiling, disassembling or translating any Exam in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, verbal or written, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose

For general questions regarding security issues and questions, contact the Microsoft Learning - Security Team (mlsecure@microsoft.com).

If you have any information regarding piracy, exam fraud, violations or abuse, you are asked to contact Training & Certification Tips (tctips@microsoft.com)

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Theft

Here's a remarkable example of theft.

During a customer event, Microsoft Learning distributed Microsoft Certification exam vouchers to event attendees who participated in a customer survey. The fine print clearly stated that vouchers were available to survey respondents, limit one voucher per customer, and vouchers had no resale value.

Bonnie, who attended the event, returned to the survey booth multiple times over the 5-day event. She made sure different people were managing the booth and proceeded to answer the same survey over and over again. She walked away from the event with 17 vouchers. The assessed retail value of each voucher was approximately US$150.

One week later, Microsoft Learning Security was informed that Microsoft Certification exam vouchers were being sold on Proseware.com (a popular online auction website). Working with Proseware’s compliance team, Microsoft Learning Security was able to track the seller’s account.

The details of the theft were uncovered as part of a Microsoft Learning Security investigation. Bonnie admitted to fraudulently obtaining and selling “maybe 10” vouchers to out of state individuals who paid US$100 for each stolen voucher. Bonnie admitted to using the proceeds to pay for her own Desktop Support – Enterprise exam and training resources.

Bonnie was permanently banned from the Microsoft Certification Program. The matter has been referred to law enforcement.

For general questions regarding security issues and questions, contact the Microsoft Learning - Security Team (mlsecure@microsoft.com).

If you have any information regarding piracy, exam fraud, violations or abuse, you are asked to contact Training & Certification Tips (tctips@microsoft.com)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Not So Sharp!

If you’re ever arrested for smuggling, an excuse that almost never works is “Idunno.”

Last March, Shuh San walked into a testing facility in China to take Exam 70-668: PRO: Microsoft SharePoint 2010, Administrator.  Before walking into the examination room, per the proctor’s instructions, Shuh San = placed his belonging in a locker… all but one…

45 minutes into the exam, the proctor noticed Shuh San pushing himself away from the desk and holding his hand towards the computer screen. Upon further observation the proctor realized that Shuh San was bold enough to sneak a cell phone into the examination room.  The cell phone was examined fully and it was confirmed that Shuh San had taken screen-shots of the exam. Shuh San’s response when approached by the proctor: “Idunno”.

This is completely against Microsoft Certification Exam policy. Shuh San’s exam was immediately stopped, the screen shots were purged from his cell phone and he was escorted out of the testing center. But it didn’t end there. Shuh San was permanently banned from the Microsoft Certification Program and is no longer eligible to participate in the program. Worst yet, Shuh San worked for A. Datum Corporation, when his employer requested validation of Microsoft Certification; Shuh San could not provide it and had to reveal that he did not receive his MCITP Certification and was no longer a Microsoft Certified Professional; a requirement of his employment.

Although this particular candidate was blatantly involved in content theft, any type of cheating is not tolerated. It erodes the value of Microsoft Certifications. “Idunno” is not an excuse. Candidates should familiarize themselves with all Microsoft Certification exam policies and procedures prior to taking a Microsoft Certification exam.

If a candidate is caught cheating, violating testing rules, or diminishing the security and integrity of the Microsoft Certification exams in any way, the candidate may be prohibited from taking any Microsoft Certification exams and/or may be decertified from the Microsoft Certification Program.  Such fraud includes, but is not limited to, the following:

  1. Modifying and/or altering the original results/score report for this Exam or any other exam records
  2. Violation of the current exam retake policy
  3. Fraudulently impersonating another to gain access to the Exam
  4. Submission of any work that is not completely your own
  5. Providing or accepting improper assistance
  6. Using unauthorized materials in an attempt to satisfy Exam requirements (this includes using brain-dump material and/or unauthorized publication of Exam questions with or without answers)
  7. Disseminating actual Exam content
  8. Possession of non-authorized items at the testing center during an Exam
  9. Misconduct as determined by statistical analysis
  10. Copying, publishing, disclosing, transmitting, selling, offering to sell, posting, downloading, distributing in any way, or otherwise transferring, modifying, making derivative works of, reverse engineering, decompiling, disassembling or translating any Exam in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, verbal or written, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose

For general questions regarding security issues and questions, contact the Microsoft Learning - Security Team (mlsecure@microsoft.com).

If you have any information regarding piracy, exam fraud, violations or abuse, you are asked to contact Training & Certification Tips (tctips@microsoft.com)

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The names of companies, products, people, characters, and/or data mentioned herein are fictitious and are in no way intended to represent any real individual, company, product, or event, unless otherwise noted. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation.

Your comment has been posted.   Close
Thank you, your comment requires moderation so it may take a while to appear.   Close
Leave a Comment
  • * Please enter your name
  • * Please enter a comment
  • Post
  • Wow! Interesting to see these real stories, and interesting that Microsoft has finally decided to be more public about its anti-cheating efforts on an individual level.

  • This is a great idea to publish these stories. It is too often I see sites where people have not read or do not understand the certification agreement. Things as simple as forums where people ask about the exam content, thankfully most people refuse to disclose this to these people. Hopefully this will help and bring more value to all the honest MCP's worldwide. Thank you for this blog.

  • Huh? And your point with this article is...? I am an MCT, I know for fact that people will always try to cheat, but again, I really don't see the idea behind this article. Apologies for that

  • Calin, by posting true stories like this, we've got two intentions:

    1) we're hoping to dissuade other folks from trying the same things. I remember when I was pretty new to Microsoft and we had a "Police Blotter" column in our internal newspaper, full of stupid and illegal things that some unscrupulous employees tried to get away with. Usually the stories were entertaining (in a warped way), but the main message was obviously, "don't even think about trying this..."

    2) we're showing that contrary to a popular belief, we really do (and always have) followed up on this kind of stuff. In the past, our legal departments have been very loathe to let us talk about it publicly, but this "names and places have been changed to protect the guilty" approach seems to be an acceptable compromise.

  • Why would a person want to cheat?  you oughta know your stuff anyway once you are working for a potentially company.  you will get escort out the door if you can't perform your job-flat out.  man, these people are not thinking straight.

  • If you want to elimintate cheating, then the focus point should be on the structure of the exams. Multiple choice are the easiest exams to cheat on. Essays are harder, and skills demonstration are (99.9%, usual disclaimers apply) almost impossible.

    The lab demonstration of 70-515 is a start, but this is long overdue. With virtualisation and remote capabilities having both progressed to their current levels, why is MS not using virtualised environments for all their exams? When I can be in Luton, and remote in to work on a problem on a server in Rio De Janeiro, why can't I go to a test centre local to me, and remote in to MS test environments to demonstrate my Exchange, SQL or SCOM skills?

    If we look at the Exchange exam 70-662, this would be my expectation of the test:

    Scenario 1: Six servers in the environment, including shared storage as needed. Windows default installation on most, one is a DC. Task list says to install Two (Hub Transport and Client Access) servers, one Clustered Mailbox. Add mailboxes to all users in [insert several OUs] but not the service accounts in [OU service accounts]. Once the examinee presses "Task Complete" the scenario is locked and they cannot return.

    As well as testing basic installation techniques, it can test their use of the EMC or EMS. If they choose to enable mailboxes individually, this will be time consuming (as in the working world) and they will likely run out of time to complete the other scenarios. Test the scenario by having a script run that does the following: a) all users that should be mail-enabled can send/receive mail b) all service accounts attempt to send/receive mail. The scenario is only passed if the first completes successfully, and the second fails due the accounts not being mail-enabled. If the reverse is true of either, then they fail.

    Scenario 2: An external client is receiving certificate errors when using OWA. The examinee needs to resolve this, and the external client should be able to access OWA without errors.

    Again, a scripted test for this would be along the lines of "access OWA, if certificate error, then fail. Send/receive mail test, calendar test (whatever else you think they should be able to do)". The cause and resolution can be whatever problems people run into. Here I was thinking about the need for the SAN on the cert to include the external as well as internal FQDN.

    Put together a pool of thirty/fifty/however-many scenarios, and the exam consists of 5/10/15. Complete all within 1/2/3 hours. If you want to, you could then make the exam the same as real-world working conditions: open book, search-engine accessible connections. Most people who encounter error codes don't know what they mean. They search for the answers. 0x80070643 should not be stuck in my head due to exam revision. If it's there, it is because of repeated exposure through work.

    As long as multiple choice exams are how MS write their exams, people have the choice of revise for hours, or memorise the answers through braindumps. If you use skill demonstration, then people have no choice but to develop the skills that professionals actually use in the job: problem solving, knowledge of the product and experience through repeated exposure to common issues.

  • Part 2: Because Seconds After Posting, More Thoughts Occur

    Skill Demonstration will eliminate the largest, most prolific form of cheating: braindumps. But current forms of cheating may see a rise, and doubtless new ones will crop up.

    Currently, Hired Gunmen are a small but notorious form of existing cheating. If braindumps are rendered useless, then HG's will undoubtedly gain prevalence as the preferred form of cheating. But this comes down to a trust issue. Test centres are expected to verify examinees identity. This should be more rigorous. Most of the time my ID is given little more than a cursory glance. If I bring a passport, sometimes they don't even check the photo: they just note the number as proof they have "seen" it.

    Test Centre collaboration is extremely rare, but I can see that growing if the Skills Demonstration was the format for all exams. Here, you would need to put pressure on Prometric to increase the quality of the staff. If there is a susceptibility for certain centres, areas or countries to conspire with examinees, then MS should ban testing at the Prometric centres, and use the MS Regional offices. And quite honestly, I think it would be better for the certification system as a whole if that model was followed in every country. It would put a little of the trust back into it, and braindumps, paper MCSE's, etc. have hurt the credibility of MS exams a lot.

    If the examinee is identified and authorised successfully, and the only way to pass the exam is by having the knowledge and skill to use the product(s) in question, MS certification will be in a much better position than it is now.

  • 240 Microsoft Team blogs searched, 72 blogs have new articles. 158 new articles found searching from

  • I think the value of Microsoft exam's are diminished by these acts and others like them. Therefore, exposing them openly on the web is a great idea and should help sustain the value of the exams.

  • For what it's worth, the exams are difficult enough now, they do have real world examples and driving the GUI and command line interfaces in the last 2 tests I took. I have spent a lot of my time and the VA's money, no reason to flush it away by cheating. For what it's worth.

    Real!

  • The multiple choice exams I tried for were not easy at all and just about impossible to 'memorise' for to many ways of asking the same question, and there were not dumps of info to help revise.

    Understanding the product and deciphering a Microsoft exam question is another matter. I would love to know what I got wrong so I could learn from it and work out what the question was all about and understand the product better.

  • Sorry but MS is clueless.  If you want to stop cheating, you need to have a pool of questions that deal with EVERY DAY situations.  if you have a test with 50 questions then there needs to be at a minimum a 500 question pool.

    Brain Dumps make MS tests worthless and even in .net 4 they are the same exact questions for every test for every tester.  This is why companies don't take these seriously, this is why most MVP's don't even have certifications.  

    For 65 dollars you can get your entire .net 2-4 certification set of transcenders and PDF's and pass effortlessly.  (Plus testing costs).

    We were told in 3.5 they would make them cheat proof, we were told again for .net 4.0 that there would be no way to cheat yet we have yet to see MS take this seriously.  the top 10 search for MCPD study material will bring up sites that state they don't give out the answers, nor use any real test questions from any vendor, but when you go test you will realize they are the questions word for word.

    Even the .net 4 ones that just came out a month or so ago.

    They aren't worth the paper they are printed on and it seems if they were serious something would have been done by now.   This needs to be addressed and MS has known about this problem for 5 years and has yet to seem to care, so why should we?

  • MY COMMENT ABOVE OWNED MICROSOFT

Page 1 of 1 (13 items)
Your comment has been posted.   Close
Thank you, your comment requires moderation so it may take a while to appear.   Close
Leave a Comment
  • * Please enter your name
  • * Please enter a comment
  • Post