Helping You Master Microsoft Technologies

There once was a beta…

Born To Learn

Born To Learn Blogs

There once was a beta…

Rate This

I’d like to tell you a little story about a beta named 71-659: TS: Windows Server 2008 R2, Server Virtualization.

Notifications were sent

Using our SME profile database, we identified folks who expressed interest in a beta, who had work experience with virtualization, and who authorized us to send contact info to our vendors. These SMEs were sent a notification that included the beta code and details about when registration would open. This message explicitly states that it is not a guarantee of a seat in the beta.

Beta codes leaked

A couple people who received notifications posted the beta code on their blogs. I guess it’s possible that these people didn’t consider that posting the beta code would be unfair to others who had submitted SME profiles. Going forward, folks who publicly post a beta code before it is available on Born to Learn may be removed from the SME database. Consider this fair warning.

Registration opened

Registration opened at 12 am Eastern Standard Time today. (For those of you who asked—registration always opens at 12 am Eastern time on the date in the notification.)

The seats filled up

Given the level of interest in virtualization, we had more qualified SME profiles in the database than we have seats in the beta. Consequently, the seats filled up within a couple of hours from when registration opened. We currently have no plans to extend the limit.

The part you don’t want to hear

The purpose of a beta exam is to collect data on the items. This data helps us ensure the quality and validity of the exam. In order to get the right data, we need candidates of different skill levels.

I know this is going to get some folks riled up, but I’m going to say it anyway. You are not entitled to a seat in a beta. You are not entitled to take a beta exam because you’re an expert. You are not entitled to take a beta exam because you’re an MCT. You are not entitled to take a beta exam because you are passionate about the technology.

If you are part of the target audience, you are simply eligible for the beta--along with everyone else who is part of the audience. You have no more right to a seat than anyone else who is eligible.

The moral of the story

The terrible thing about betas is that there are always unhappy people. Everyone thinks they should get a seat before someone else. But seats are limited. Seats are first-come, first-served. The moral: there are no guarantees in the world of beta exams.

The end

flying pony unicornI wish the story had a happier ending complete with purple and pink flying pony unicorns. But it is what it is. We’re doing our best to ensure that those in the SME database receive beta registration information before sharing it on Born to Learn. Unfortunately, there will always be those who try to circumvent the system and make it difficult for the rest of you. We know it, and we will do what we can to fix it.

Your comment has been posted.   Close
Thank you, your comment requires moderation so it may take a while to appear.   Close
Leave a Comment
  • * Please enter your name
  • * Please enter a comment
  • Post
  • I think the problem this time was that between the email being sent (Nov 26) and the registration opening on the 1st of December gave plenty of time to the SME idiots who leaked the code out. Previously the time lapse between the SME email and registration opening was a day or two. Instead of a blanket promotion code would a individualised voucher number not work better? I know it would be higher overhead but would ensure the SMEs have no interest in leaking the code that is issued to them for that exam and then when the SME registration period has lapsed and it is being posted on born to learn then a generic code is used as before?
  • I want to thank you for this posting. It is good to see a nice clear concise explanation.
  • Thanks for the post, understood.
  • Ditto! Thanks for the post. I second Farhan's suggestion.
  • Krista, thanks for the post.
    I just did a google search on the promo code and "659" and it appears that most of the places that have the promo code posted are forums. Unfortunately I would think it would be next to impossible to police that kind of sharing. As much as we all would like a better way of limiting the promo code to those that were actually sent the email, that would probably be a lot more work for both MS Learning and Prometric. This is a free test that we're talking about and although I am disappointed that I didn't get a seat, I don't expect MS to bend over backwards to give me free stuff. Fortunately I now know what time the registration goes live so I can plan accordingly in the future.
  • Thanks Krista,

    Could someone in MSL explain if "....Early invitations to MCP beta exams" are still an "official" MCT Program benefit, as clearly stated in

    https://mcp.microsoft.com/mct/program/benefits/...

    ."..Early invitations to MCP beta exams: Be among the first to acquire new certifications by taking new MCP exams before they are available to the public...."
  • Hi Farhan,
    I agree that the lag was too long this time. I sent out the notifications prior to our Thanksgiving holiday because I was afraid folks in the US would miss it--looks like I needn't have worried over that.
    Individualized voucher codes is a good idea in theory, but we would still have a problem of higher demand than availability. We are not opposed to changing the system, but any changes still need to preserve some of the "free-for-all" nature of the current process, which ensures we can get candidates with a wide range of skills.
    Speaking of "SME idiots," maybe our Born to Learn readers can help us out by watching forums for the beta code leaks and report them to us--then we can try to figure out who is doing it so they won't be included in future notifications. I'll think on it and see what we can do.
  • Hi Krista,

    I personally was looking forward to the pink flying pony unicorns more than the actual test, though I too was disappointed to find out that program was full when I called at 8AM PST. That said... I do not think that program changes are needed.

    Keep up the good work, and thanks for getting in front of this issue and explaining Microsoft's position on the matter.
  • This is very easy to fix. An exam can be paid for by using either a promotional code such as the publicized code or by a voucher number, which is unique. Stop sending out promotional codes. Send a voucher number to each SME. Want to give out your voucher number? Go right ahead knowing that the first person who uses it will be the only person who can use it. People publicized generic promotional codes in the past because it never really had any consequences.

    If Microsoft gives out unique voucher numbers, then no effort needs to be expended policing it. Obviously emailing unique codes is a little more difficult, but that is what code is for.
  • Hi Krista,
    I totally agree with you : candidates of different skill levels and Seats are first-come, first-served. I don't think nothing better than this. Keep doing the good work...

    I hope that the guys that are publishing the Beta codes before availability on Born to Learn, stop doing this
  • I guess I was one of the lucky ones. My flight got in around 11:30 PM Seattle time, and finally got to my hotel around 1am (what the heck is going on with the 405 these days?). For about 30 seconds I seriously considered going to bed and waiting until the morning to register. Glad I did it right away instead.

    You're right, pretty much the only way to keep this from happening is to use vouchers instead of promo codes. Even if registration opened 5 minutes after the promo code is mailed out, you'd still get a large number of applicants who got the code from a web site somewhere and you'd still get a large number of SMEs who didn't get the invite before the beta was full.

    Anyways, how about the other two exams? Have invites gone out to those yet and I just missed them, or are they forthcoming?
  • Agree....If MSL attempts to fulfill the committed MCT Progran Benefit 100%, It doesn't seems too much of a hassle generate unique voucher numbers, and still keep the FIFO rule........unless....the benefit had been retired and we haven't been informed.
  • Most of this post should be clear to anyone who received the invite email, since it is just repeating what was said in the email. Did you really get a lot of email from complainers? Nobody has anyone to blame but themselves, especially given the long warning time... I was on the prometric website at just after 12AM EST, 9PM my time, and registered without incident.
  • Hi Jose,

    As the MCT Community Lead at Microsoft Learning, I'm still very happy that we offer this to MCTs. Technically it is not a benefit (ergo 'part of the deal) but it is a special offer. I know, you'd probably consider that 'fine print' and I could take that point :-)!

    In my opinion, what we see here is not the result of any late notice or us offering less beta exams. In as little as 2.5 years, the MCT community grew from 10,000 MCTs to 16,000MCTs. At the same time, any MCP or MCT these days is more cost aware. With the introduction of Born to Learn we have also greatly increased our reach and speed of communications, while at the same time social networks in general have grown in strength and anything you publish can be shared on hundreds of sites/forums in no time. Add it all up and this explains the 'rush' on free exams.

    Please trust me in that I mean nothing more than to analyze a trend we've seen develop during the last year, in fact in my role I'm actually against any benefit or offer that causes more dissatisfaction than it causes satisfaction... That would be the complete opposite of our intentions!

    What we learn from this right now is that we do need to look at how to reach you in a more targeted manner, at the same time I fear that we'll also have to accept that these beta exams are now much more in demand. I'd hate to see this drive dissatisfaction while we intend to create a win-win situation (data for us, free exams for you).

    Finally, I'd like to thank Krista for sharing the background info and for looking into how we can fine tune the process and I'd like to thank all of those who commented as you've helped drive a very constructive debate!
  • I think that sending out one-time voucher codes will help definetly.
    OR
    you announce the the Beta 5 days before like at the moment but without the Code.
    {
    Then the code could be sent the day it starts, but everyone will know when to look.
    OR
    you have to answer the mail, klick on a link and register with your email to get a voucher sent
    }

    Think the last one with registering on the first come first get basis and then sending a voucher might be a good alternative....
Page 1 of 6 (80 items) 12345»
Your comment has been posted.   Close
Thank you, your comment requires moderation so it may take a while to appear.   Close
Leave a Comment
  • * Please enter your name
  • * Please enter a comment
  • Post