Certification or College Degree: Which Should You Choose? (hint: both)

Posted by Ken Rosen
Oct 6, 2009 : 01:29 GMT
Filed under Spotlight, Uncategorized
Comments comment email digg twitter facebook live
 
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 4.14 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Brian Reinholz wrote an interesting article for Windows IT Pro Magazine about how virtual labs are making college a more realistic continuing education option for busy IT Pros. But while I’m definitely a proponent of virtual labs and a strong believer in the ability of v-labs to make training more streamlined and affordable, I’m actually more intrigued by Brian’s lead-in:

“As a lowly liberal arts alumnus, I’ve developed a growing cynicism for the importance of a college degree. It’s not uncommon for me to advise friends to pursue a skills-based degree or certification, such as for the variety of medical specialist positions out there, over a traditional academic degree… Certifications demonstrate specific expertise in specific technology, preparing you for the real world, right? So what do you need a college degree for? You might think I sound silly by now, but this is how most of us liberal arts majors feel.”

However, Brian goes on to note that IT Pros without a degree feel like they are at a competitive disadvantage:

“After speaking with a few people in the IT industry though, I see that college degrees are still a very big deal, and many IT pros that don’t have a degree feel at a disadvantage compared to young professionals coming out of the gate with one.”

So to sum up, if you accept Brian’s generalizations (and I do in fact hear these views expressed often), IT Pros with college degrees aren’t sure the return is worth the investment, but IT Pros without degrees are pretty sure it is. During our recent bus tour across the U.S., we heard this question raised a lot: which is better to pursue, a college degree or a technical certification?

My answers then were the same as they are now:

My cop-out answer? Both.

My forced-to-choose answer? Both. (I’ll explain that one in a bit)

Looking back over my career from IT consultant to technical instructor to courseware developer to product manager to marketer to team manager, I can’t mentally subtract either my college degree or my certifications and think for a minute that I’d have enjoyed anywhere near the same level of professional success and satisfaction.

Now that might not seem like such a provocative statement until I add: I graduated from a liberal arts college with a history degree.

How did a history degree prepare me for a twelve-years-and-counting career at Microsoft? By requiring me to prove my ability to research, write, analyze and present—skills that my job requires on a daily basis. For me, college was never about receiving information but rather acquiring skill. I could have majored in computer science, economics, theology, sociology, pretty much anything, and I would have entered the job market with the same valuable skill set.

But that skill set was unfocused—I graduated college in the middle of a recession, and it wasn’t until I acquired my first Microsoft certification that my career took off. When I was able to add a set of skills on a very specific (and very successful) vendor’s software platform to the broader skill set I acquired in college, a world of opportunity was opened for me, because I had proven myself in both general and specific arenas.

And that’s important—because, let’s face it: vendor certifications are essentially a gamble on the long-term success of that company, and even if Microsoft is still a strong player twenty years down the road, I suspect that nobody’s going to remember what an MCSE was by then—but your college degree will probably still hold its worth.

Sounds like I have a bias towards college degrees over certifications, doesn’t it? Truthfully, I do. I think they hold their value longer and they attest to your versatility. But at some point, your company or client is going to place a bet on a vendor, and they’ll place a lot of value on you if you’ve made the same bet.

So do you need to choose after all? No, and here’s why:

If you can afford a college degree—both in time and money—you can afford a technical certification. Instructor-led training is typically the fastest and therefore most expensive way to get certified, but it’s not the only way. You can study at your own pace using e-learning or a self-paced training kit, or take a middle-ground hybrid approach. With the self-discipline to study and practice, you can acquire an MCTS certification—including the prep and the actual exams–for under $200 US. Compared to the cost of a typical four-year college degree, that’s barely even a measureable fraction.

You don’t have to choose between a college degree and a technical certification—and you shouldn’t. Get both, and position yourself for short-term and long-term success.


  • As someone who has missed out on numerous promotions and new job opportunities because I do not have a degree all I can say is "What he said!" Yes certificates have weight for those who do not have experience but degrees, even an Associates Degree offers you a future beyond where you start off at.
  • andrewbettany
    Interesting thought.

    However how would this relate to a career changer or a person who is new to IT without a degree? Would you suggest he goes back to get a degree at 30 years old or instead to pursue his MCITP on Server 2008 and a work placement/sponsor? I favour the latter advice.

    What are the learned thoughts of Ken et al?
  • D_R_Stewart
    As someone who's in this very situation, I'd have to recommend a degree. Even an associate's degree from a community college gives you some gravitas, and the formality of knowledge gained gives you a good foundation for your MCITP. If you can't do both at the same time, consider a vendor-neutral, entry-level certification such as Network+. A degree (albeit a "beginner" one) and a certification increase your chances dramatically, even in a harsh economy.
  • andrewbettany
    Hi, thanks for the response.

    I think for a career changer aged around 30 who wants to "get into IT" then he will need the A+, maybe the MCDST and then get a helpline level 1 position. That will pay the bills. He the needs to certify more and get lots of experience. By the end of year 2 he could be attaining the Technology Specialist exams and then move up to leve 2 tech and grab the MCITP.

    Unless the guy is hugely motivated to be be a top flight IT CIO or director I doubt spending 3-4 years to study and obtain a degree at his age will help him pay the bills during the change...(though obtaining a degree will open doors with the blue chip companies for sure at a higher level)

    I would wager that obtaining the necessary on the job training, self study and taking certifications will help him into the industry in the first instance. Anyone could then take a degree as a part time option if this appealled.

    Regards

    Andrew MCT, MCITP, MCSE
  • You're right, Andrew, I was thinking about students primarily.

    For a 30-year-old new-to-IT individual, I'd recommend certification first, because it's a quick way to get your foot in the door... but it's definitely a short-term solution.

    The problem with relying solely on certifications is that your fortunes may rise and fall with those of the vendor(s) you've aligned with. I'd recommend pursuing a degree over time for insurance, starting sooner rather than later. :-)
  • Eddy
    I'm a 20 year old IT Tech from the UK, but I now work in Austria. In both of these European countries seeing a degree as an IT job requirement is extremely rare, most of the time a MCSE/MCITP:EA or MCSA/MCITP:SA or a Cisco exam is stipulated. A degree in Austria is much cheaper than in the UK, so many people still have degrees, even Master's degrees, but where do all these people work? All the people I have encountered in thsi country with a Master's all work as receptionists - not a good investment of time and money.

    In the UK, so many people have degrees now, that it has become diluted. Also, the % needed to pass a certification exam is much higher than that needed to get a degree. Between 70%-80% needed for certifaction exams, and for an 'average' (2:2) level degree pass it's only about 55%!!! 70%-80% is a first class (1:1) and 60% is a 2:1 roughly.
  • andrewbettany
    I agree with you Eddy fully, there are a lot of degrees nowadays and new hires need something else to help them differentiate. I posted on my blog back in September (http://www.york.ac.uk/univ/advict/ita/news.cfm) that hiring managers will look at MCPs and experience on a resume if both interviewees have the same underlying educational qualifications.

    @Ken I agree up to the last point you make. I strongly believe that once an individual has attained
    a) the certification and
    b) the necessary experience
    then he has a good chance of holding down a good job and even career for at least 5-10 years before he needs to "upgrade" his skills.

    Even a medical practioner with 10 years of study or an accountant MUST continue to learn and update once they have qualified. I see little difference in the IT world today.

    As a final note, I know a LOT of middle aged IT consultants that have not upgraded their MCSA/E qualifications (to 2008 etc) and even now are deploying legacy server O/s on new installations.
    Their days are certainly numbered as Ken implies :-)
  • Pier
    I agree with getting both a degree and getting certified, but for someone like myself 22 yrs of age i am really faced with a decison should i be starting a degree 1st and after get certified or start out with a certification getting my foot through the door then a degree
blog comments powered by Disqus